From d3c0d812fec462e3d34089abdfb4592535d520b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: decentral1se Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:44:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add notes --- 2019-10-15-minutes.md | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2019-10-15-minutes.md diff --git a/2019-10-15-minutes.md b/2019-10-15-minutes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e361191 --- /dev/null +++ b/2019-10-15-minutes.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +# 2019-10-15 + +Timeline: 9am -> 12 + +Agenda: + * [x] Tools & Comms + * [x] Milestones & Roles + * [x] Mapping + * [x] Users + +Initial notes: + * Let's not fall into the code cave + * End product is not the goal (for this phase) + * Impress what is possible and work on explanations + * Load infoboxes and show what is possible, for example + * Do things manually, lowtech, etc. + * Participate in wikidata community, let each other know they exist + * Try to be a bridge between the wikidata and the wash sector (shout out to BBSes ;)) + * MVP: What is interesting, possible and should be done + * After this, letters of support, procurement, references, partnerships + * Shadow the process and think through software backing for this process + * Nick has a network of people, know that the end of the line is conferences + * Glass, Trackfin - doing reporting but WASHNote could make this useful for planning + +Tools: +* github: repos, kanban: + * https://github.com/WASHNote + * Organising project via https://github.com/nickdickinson/WASHWeb/projects/1 +* dropbox: files +* airtable: for scheming with data + +Comms: + * IRC - make #washnote on freenode + * Signal for p2p for now + +Mapping: + * Paper time! + +Interfaces: + * UI can be wikipedia! + * UI can be algorithmia! + * Integration with stuff works + * "The web is the UI" + +End-users: + * 1) Associations, interest groups - people who organise the sector - RWSN, SUSANA, PSEAU, IRC + * 2) International orgs - policy makers, standards - WASH (not data people), working on enabling + * People who work in wash sector at different levels + +1) is probably enough to start. Who to get interested with the minimal offering +2) trying to work with 2) could strategically work for getting sustainable work + +Value of information has be validated. It's been collected, people know it is useful +However, they are siloed! They are not exactly closed, you can download it, but it is not linked, explorable +Our offering: linked data in the washweb +Creating registry focus on the linked data offering - associations are the targets +The 2) have funding and still being on the registry generating views on the registry for 2) to improve their ops +WHO - tleveraging their data, keeping it in sync, making it linked, providing value + +Example first steps: + * Come to IATI community and propose to Wikidata-ify their registry in collaboration with wikidata people + * Find out all the problems with that and try to solve them + * Take results of this approach to organisations + +Concretely: + * Write blogpost about the registry + * Speak to orgs/communities/try to get a buy in / feedback + * Build on the use case of the registry \ No newline at end of file