Identify first use case #25
Labels
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: WASHWeb/WASHWeb-2019#25
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Idea to focus in on one country to pilot the integration of WASH data sets with wiki data and reduce the amount of manual research and data input required before we can generate a genuinely useful wikipedia page or info box, which people will be able to see.
OK, as outlined in research from https://github.com/WASHNote/WASHWeb/issues/26:
So, @nickdickinson, do you want to then:
From there, we will have a much better idea of how to proceed once we have touched base with the wikidata people, we have seen if they understand what we want to achieve and if what we're trying to do is acceptable.
OK, so I created to simplified use case pages. @decentral1se it is not yet fully defined, perhaps you have template?
Here is a global use case: https://github.com/WASHNote/WASHWeb/wiki/First-global-WASH-Web-use-case
Here is a country use case, like we first imagined it: https://github.com/WASHNote/WASHWeb/wiki/First-country-WASH-Web-use-case
@nickdickinson ok cool!
Firstly, templates. The one I look to when I want to take a good stab at is "fully dressed" although there is also "casual" :) You could use that as a guide to structure your pages.
Secondly, some comments:
https://github.com/WASHNote/WASHWeb/wiki/First-country-WASH-Web-use-case
https://github.com/WASHNote/WASHWeb/wiki/First-global-WASH-Web-use-case
Anyway, that's my passing quick take.
I'll pick up reading on the ins-and-outs of info boxes from the technical standpoint again!
Here is the latest. I focused on the country case but also completed the cross country case:
@decentral1se Can you check both?
Good stuff @nickdickinson! Reckon we have enough to go on for now, well done.
Closing as we're now going to actually work on the datasets and partnerships to test this out.